SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 297

GHULAM MOHAMMED
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. , Warangal – Appellant
Versus
Kammidi Rajireddy – Respondent


GHULAM MOHAMMED, J.

( 1 ) IN both the CMA Insurance Company is the appellant. The CMA 46 and 65 of 91 arise out of OP No. 229 of 88 and 227 of 88 respectively which were clubbed together and a common order was passed on 30-8-1990. In CMA No. 46 of 88 the petitioner Kommireddi Rajireddy who sustained injuries claimed compensation of Rs. 30,000. 00, whereas CM A 65 of 91 which arose out of OP 227 of 88 filed by the wife of the petitioner in OP 229/88 claimed compensation of Rs. 55,000. 00 on the ground that by virtue of the accident occurred on 11-4-1988 the child in the womb died. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

( 2 ) THE claimant/petitioner in OP 227/ 88 was resident of Kamareddypalli village and on the date of accident she came to the bus stand of Kamareddypalli to go to Hanamakonda along with her husband Mr. Raji Reddy. The petitioner at that time was carrying nine months of pregnancy, at that time a Jeep bearing No. ATI 4275 going towards Hanamakonda agreed to give lift to both the petitioners/claimants and some others and they boarded the said Jeep bearing No. ATI 4275 and unfortunately when the said jeep reached near to the agricultural farm at about 9. 30 a. m. a bu
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top