C.V.N.SASTRY
Chennawar and Company – Appellant
Versus
Madhusudan Rao – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel on both sides.
( 2 ) THIS is a revision filed by the tenants questioning the orders of eviction passed against them by the two Courts below concurrently under the provisions of the A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (in short the Act ).
( 3 ) THE respondent/landlord is an advocate practising in City Civil Court at Secunderabad. The suit premises is a non-residential building wherein the petitioners are carrying on wholesale business in textiles. The premises consists of two rooms, one on the ground floor and the other on the first floor, located in a busy commercial area known as Tobacco Bazaar in Secunderabad. The rent payable is Rs. 400. 00 per month. The respondent/land-lord filed the eviction petition on the sole ground that he requires the suit premises for his personal use, that is, for the purpose of carrying on his profession. It is his case that presently he is running his office in a rented premises in R. P. Road, Secunderabad, which is very small, congested and wholly insufficient for running his office. The said rented premises consists of a single room on the mezzanine floor measuring 9 1/2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.