SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 406

A.GOPAL REDDY
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. , Kakinada – Appellant
Versus
Namala China Apparao – Respondent


A. GOPAL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the Insurance Company questioning the award dated 29-1-1994 in OP No. 380/91 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Rajahmundry.

( 2 ) THE facts that led to the filing of the appeal are as follows : The first petitioner is the maternal uncle of the deceased. The second petitioner is the wife of the first petitioner. The third petitioner is the sister of the deceased Kosuri Raju. They filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for compensation for the death of Kosuri Raju who died on 26-9-1991 in a motor accident, stating that the deceased and another G. Satyanarayana were going to Mandapeta and that when they reached Ippanapadu lock, the tractor-trailer No. AP-5t 1412 and AP 5 1416 was proceeding from Mandapeta to Ippanapadu, driven by the first respondent in rash and negligent manner dashed against the deceased who was going on the left side of the road. The tractor ran over the deceased and he died on the spot. The deceased was aged about 20 years and was working as a tractor driver and was getting a net income of Rs. 1200. 00 per month and he was supporting the entire family. It is furth












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top