( 1 ) THE petitioners are the ex-casual labourers. On an earlier occasion, they had filed W. P. No. 407 of 1996 in this Court. When that writ petition came up for hearing, it was conceded by the Counsel appearing for both the sides that the said writ petition was squarely covered by the Order of this Court in W. P. No. 13560 of 1993, dated 7-10-1993. In view of this submission made by the learned Counsel for the parties, the Court disposed of the writ petition on 29-3-1996 issuing a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the writ petitioners for regular appointment to the eligible posts in accordance with the Memorandum No. l 138/85-1, dated 26-8-S985, if they are eligible.

( 2 ) THE petitioners complaining that as per the direction of the Court though they were interviewed, till date their services are not absorbed and nothing was heard from the respondents, filed the instant writ petition seeking intervention of the Court.

( 3 ) IN response to rule nisi, the respondents have filed counter affidavit. In the counter affidavit, the respondents have stated that in pursuance of the Court s direction, the Selection Committee constituted by the respondents i