SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 496

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, V.V.S.RAO
Bhagirathi Bai – Appellant
Versus
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, A. P. , Saifabad, Hyderabad – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Appeal is directed against the order of a learned single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 23476 of 1997. Writ petitioner is the appellant. She filed the said writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to pay interest till the final award is passed and consequently to quash the award dated 13-5-1997 passed by the Forest Settlement Officer, Uppal, Hyderabad as the same is passed in violation of sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act.

( 2 ) A few facts which are necessary for the disposal of the appeal may be noticed. One Suit. Bhagirathibai was the owner of land measuring Ac. 271-18 guntas known as shikarga in Anantasagar, hamlet of Anantagiri village, Vikarabad Mandal, Rangareddy District. For the purpose of reserve forestation, the Government issued notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 7-7-1970 proposing to acquire the entire extent of land. In the preliminary valuation, the Land Acquisition Officer valued the entire land at Rs. 13,64,744-89 ps. Later an award was passed by the L. A. O. for a compensation of Rs. 3,69,959-71 ps. Challenging the same the writ petitioner filed Wri








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top