T. CH. SURYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful defendant is the Appellant. The respondents herein are the plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs filed the suit for eviction of the defendant from the plaint schedule property.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts are that the plaintiffs filed the suit mentioning in the plaint inter alia that the plaintiffs are the owners of the plaint schedule property which is a mango tope. They appointed the defendant as their watchman a few years ago for plaint schedule property and they allowed the defendant to live in the thatched hut existing in the mango tope belonging to the plaintiffs. On the directions of the plaintiffs the defendant was growing vegetables on small pieces of the land and the expenses therefor were being borne by the plaintiffs. The defendant suddenly became greedy and started appropriating the vegetables etc. , for himself. Therefore, the plaintiffs paid an amount of Rs. 1200. 00 to the defendant on 24-4-1980 and terminated his services. Fearing that the defendant might enter into the schedule property highhandedly they filed a suit O. S. No. 17 of 1981 on the file of the Principal District Munsif s Court, Kakinada, and obtained an interim injun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document