( 1 ) RULE nisi. Ms. Jyothi Kiran took notice for respondents. The writ petition was heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is currently serving as Conductor in the establishment of APSRTC. On certain alleged misconduct, departmental enquiry was initiated by issuing charge memo. The Enquiry Officer has already conducted the enquiry and submitted his report. On receipt of the report, the disciplinary authority considering the same, issued second show cause notice proposing the petitioner s removal from the service of APSRTC as disciplinary measure. The second show cause notice is dated 3-7-1999. Hence, this writ petition assailing the validity of the same.

( 3 ) SRI A. K. Jayaprakash Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner, would highlight certain irregularities and illegalities that have crept into the enquiry and on that count, appeal to the Court to entertain the writ petition and adjudicate upon the contentions touching irregularities and illegalities. The same contentions which are taken in the writ petition and sought to be highlighted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, could be put forth before the di