SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 479

T.CH.SURYA RAO
Habeeb Sultana – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Sharfuddin Khan – Respondent


T. CH. SURYYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful plaintiff filed the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 24-4-1987 passed by the learned Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Warangal, in OS No. 52 of 1983.

( 2 ) SHE filed the suit for recovery of Mehar amount and for return of jehaz articles to her, mentioning in the plaint inter alia that she was married to the defendant on 1-12-1972 at Hanamkonda and she gave birth to three sons and that her husband through a letter dated 7-1-1983 addressed to her father pronounced triple talaq dissolving the marriage and that later the defendant married another woman by name Azamath Sullhana and therefore, she was entitled to the deferred mehar amounting to Rs. 5,000. 00 and two dinners of the value of Rs. 10. 00 each with interest at 18% per annum and for the return of jehaz articles.

( 3 ) THE defendant while resisting the suit pleaded that the letter dated 7-1-1983 was a forged document and that the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant was subsisting and therefore, the plaintiff was not entitled to Metier amount. He further pleaded that on account of the conduct of the plaintiff who refused to lead conjugal Hie with h













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top