( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against an order dated 1-3-1990 passed in Miscellaneous Petition No. 27 of 1989 filed in ID No. 39 of 1987 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal at Hyderabad. By that order, the Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad, has held that the complaint filed by the second respondent-workman under Section. 33a of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short "the Act") is maintainable and that the second respondent is a workman concerned within the meaning of that term used in Section 33 of the Act. Therefore, in this case, the question as to which workman can be said to be a workman concerned within the meaning of that term used in Section 33 (2) of the Act and whether the second respondent could be treated as a workman concerned arises for decision.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of this writ petition, in brief, be stated as under: The second respondent, namely, Sri P. Raghuramulu was initially appointed as General Mazdoor in the establishment of the Singareni Collieries on 23-3-1975; he was later appointed as an Electrician in Category IV on 1-2-1977 and he was subsequently promoted to Category V on 1-3-1980. At the behest of the