SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 660

Y.V.NARAYANA
Suram Indira Devi – Appellant
Versus
Suram Bhoodevi – Respondent


Y. V. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful plaintiff in the suit is the appellant. The plaintiff instituted OS No. 5 of 1977 on the file of the District Judge, Wrangle for partition of plaint a schedule properties into four equal shares and for allotment of three such shares to the plaintiff.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience the parties to this appeal will be referred to in accordance with their ranking in the suit.

( 3 ) THE minor plaintiff Suram Indira Devi represented by their next friend and father Suram Pratap Reddy has instituted the present suit for partition of her 3/4th share in the plaint a schedule properties and also seeking an injunction against defendants 2 and 3 from in any manner interfering with her right in the properties since she was adopted by late Suram Kanakaiah who owned plaint a to c schedule properties and that by virtue of the adoption that took place on 21-4-1969 and also by virtue of Ex. A. 20 (will) executed by late Kanakaiah on 17-3-1971 she became entitled to 3/4th share in the plaint a schedule properties and all the movables in plaint b and c schedule properties and that the 1st defendant became entitled to life interest in the remaini












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top