SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 782

VAMAN RAO
Fogiri Jagannadharao – Appellant
Versus
Gorla Venkatinaidu – Respondent


VAMAN RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order passed by the District judge, Srikakulam dated 28-12-1998 passed in C. M. A. No. 60 of 1996 dismissing the appeal preferred against the order of the II Addl. District Munsif passed in I. A. No. 229 of 1996 in O. S. No. 216 of 1996 refusing temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff in the suit.

( 2 ) THE admitted facts as emerging from the affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner and respondent No. 1 in the LA. may be stated as follows: the plaint schedule property belongs to one Gorle Jagannadhamnaidu, maternal grandfather of the petitioner who gave the plaint schedule properties to his daughter Ramudamma, the mother of the petitioner, under a registered settlement deed dated 10-6-1950, the registration extract of which has been marked as Ex. A-1. Ramudamma enjoyed the properties till her death. Ramudamma had four issues i. e. , two sons and two daughters. One of the daughters Appalanarasamma died unmarried and whereabouts of her second son Narasingarao is not known since so many years. The petitioner is the other son and his sister Gorle Venkataratnam who is the wife of the first respondent is the oth
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top