SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 770

MOTILAL B.NAIK, A.GOPAL REDDY
D. Manga @ Mangamma – Appellant
Versus
D. Venkata Ramana – Respondent


MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) EXPOSURE of so much hatred and animosity aplenty in this case which culminated in the rocking of a matrimonial home of a Judicial Officer.

( 2 ) APPELLANT is the wife whose marriage with the respondent, a newly recruited Judicial Officer of the rank of District Munsif, took place on 18-5-1994. The respondent took charge as District Munsif, Amalapuram, which is his first posting, on 4-5-1994.

( 3 ) THE respondent filed O. P. No. 108 of 1997 on the file of the Additional senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry (Old O. P. No. 42 of 1996 on the file of Sub-Court, amalapuram) seeking dissolution of his marriage with the appellant under Section 13 (1) (ia) and 13 (1) (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Serious allegations and counter allegations have been levelled against each other by the respondent-husband and appellant-wife. However, we do not propose to trace those countless allegations in this judgment. We may only state few relevant facts for the purpose of disposal of this appeal.

( 4 ) FOR the purpose of convenience, the parties are addressed as petitioner-husband and respondent-wife as per their array in O. P. No. 108 of 1997 on the file of the Court below.



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top