SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 826

K.B.SIDDAPPA
A. Krishna Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


K. B. SIDDAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision is filed against the order passed in Crl MP No. 1586 of 1997 in STC No. 19 of 1995 on the file of Special Judge for trial of Essential Commodities Act-cum-III Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) BY virtue of Section 12-AA (f) all the offences under this Act shall be tried in a summary way and the provisions of Sections 262 (2), 265 (both inclusive) of the Code, shall, as far as, apply to such trial. In the instant case a part of the evidence was recorded by the previous officer, on his transfer, the present officer assumed charge. At this juncture this Crl. MP was filed to conduct de novo enquiry by virtue of Section 326 (3) Cr. PC, as the procedure contemplated under Essential Commodities Act is summary in nature. This petition was allowed and de novo enquiry was ordered. The Public Prosecutor was directed to get the witnesses as per schedule.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the law provides for summary trial the learned Special Judge adopted summons procedure in examining the witnesses. As many as eleven witnesses were examined. Their evidence verbatium was taken that is, not i




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top