SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 856

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
M. A. Abood – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Warangal – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE Award passed by the Labour Court, Warangal in ID No. 173 of 1987, dated 22-4-1988 refusing to grant any relief to the petitioner herein is challenged in this writ petition on various grounds.

( 2 ) THE petitioner while working as a Driver in the second respondent-Corporation was served with a charge-sheet containing the following charges:1. For having caused the dislocation of punctual operation of service i. e. , 8. 00 hours Hyderabad on 25-11-1982 for no written reasons and demanding change of vehicle No. AAZ 3003 booked for the said service causing inconvenience to the travelling public due to your gross negligence. This constitutes your misconduct under Regulation 28 (ix) (a) of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Regulations, 1963. 2. For your insubordination, misbehavior with AMF while on duly on 25-11-1982 in the Depot premises for no written reasons when you have been booked to work as driver for 8. 00 hours Hyderabad service with vehicle No. AAE-3003. This constitutes misconduct 28 (viii) of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Rules, 1963. 3. For having entered the depot premises on 27-11-1982 at about 12. 00 hours after knowing the fact of suspension order i























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top