SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 933

M.S.LIBERHAN, V.V.S.RAO
A. P. State Road Trans. Corpn. REP. BY ITS DEPOT MANAGER, SATHUPALLI – Appellant
Versus
S. Satyanarayan Rao – Respondent


M. S. LIBERHAN, C. J.

( 1 ) IN this Writ Appeal the undisputed facts are that the respondent herein was appointed in 1976 with the appellants-Corporation and was removed from service in 1978. The respondent raised an industrial dispute in 1987 after a lapse of nine years and he was directed to be reinstated by the Industrial tribunal without backwages but with continuity of service in 1989 vide award dated 10-4-1989. The respondent joined the service of the appellants. Consequently, his pay was refixed. The fixation of pay was never challenged. In view of a later pronouncement of this Court in Writ Petition No. 11182 of 1992, dated 17-10-1995, in the case of some other workman defining continuity of service the respondent woke up from a slumber sleep and started making representations to gain time. The first representation was made in 1996. In spite of no reply having been received with respect to the representation the respondent has not raised even a little finger. Then all of a sudden on 13-4-1999 a writ petition was filed praying for the Writ of mandamus directing the appellants to give notional increment and also revision of pay scales from time to time and consequently dire




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top