ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) QUESTIONING the impugned order dt. 21-6-1999 of the first respondent, the commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, a. P. , Hyderabad and the consequential order passed by the second respondent-the superintendant, Prohibition and Excise, visakhapatnam, in Proc. Rc. No. 1834/98/ a-1 dt. 29-6-1999 rejecting the request made by the petitioner - the licence of il: 24 for shifting his wine shop - m/s. Durga Wines, Kasimkota to any other unobjectionable location at desapatrunipalem, Visakhapatnam as illegal and unconstitutional, the present writ petition is filed.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was granted licence for the retail shop IL-24 for the excise year 1998-99 and he started the shop in the name and style of M/s. Durga Wines, at kasimkota village and commenced the business. Before granting the above said licence, the concerned authorities have conducted enquiries for the establishment of the shop in the locality. Subsequent to the establishment of the shop of the petitioner, the residents of Kasimkota village made some complaints that the shop is located adjacent to the bus stand causing nuisance. The local Gram Panchayath and mah

Click Here to Read the rest of this document