( 1 ) IN all these matters, the Commissioner, ongole Municipality is the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by the Award passed by the 2nd respondent dated 3-6-1999 in 11i. D. cases filed by the former workmen of the Municipality claiming the relief of reinstatement with back wages. The facts offered and the evidence led in all the 11i. Ds. , were the same. Therefore, the same documents were marked in each I. D. , and the same witnesses were examined. However, 11 different awards on the same day i. e. , 3-6-1999 were passed directing the petitioner to reinstate the workmen with 50% back wages and attendant benefits. As mentioned at the out set, the Writ Petitions are filed for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the award passed by the 2nd respondent. When the matters were listed for admission before me, Sri D. Srinivas, representing mr. B. Venkateswara Rao, submitted that caveat petitions are filed by the workmen and hence they may be heard. I have heard the learned Counsel for the Employer/ commissioner, Ongole Municipality and the Workmen and with their consent, the matters are being disposed of by this common order at the Admission stage.

( 2 ) FOR the purpose of