SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 1058

AVINASH SOMAKANT BHATE, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
C. P. Roy – Appellant
Versus
Special Court, under A. P. Land Grabbing Act – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) SINCE the questions of facts and law involved in all these writ petitions are common, they are clubbed and disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) WRIT Petition Nos. 22323, 22334 and 23999 of 1996 are filed challenging the common order passed by the Special Court under Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad, in LGC Nos. 45 of 1991 and 12 of 1992 dated 25-9-1996.

( 3 ) LGC No. 45 of 1991 was filed under the provisions of Section" 8 (1) of the Andhra pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) act, 1982 by the State against (1) C. P. Roy (2) Jagapathi Rao (deleted) (3) M. H. Chinoy

( 4 ) ANIL Kundal. (5) Smt. Cherukuri srilaxmi (6) M/s. Meenakshi Constructions represented by its Managing Director sivarama Prasad (7) Jamuna and (8) Shaik ismail before the Special Court. 4. LGC No. 12 of 1992 was filed by the applicants viz. , Cherukuri Srilaxmi and m/s. Meenakshi Constructions Company, represented by its Managing Director, sivarama Prasad in the Court of the additional Chief Judge-cum-Vacation Judge (Additional Judge), City Civil Court, hyderabad, in OS No. 520 of 1992. It was later transferred to the Special Court under andhra Pradesh Land Grab











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top