VAMAN RAO
Mandavilli Sujatha – Appellant
Versus
Baratam Vykuntarao – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD both sides.
( 2 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order of the Additional Senior civil Judge, Srikakulam dated 18-8-1999 passed in un-numbered I. A. filed in O. S. No. 110 of 1996.
( 3 ) THE learned Counsel for both sides agreed that the petition may be heard and disposed of on merits at the admission stage.
( 4 ) CURIOUSLY the I. A. in which the impugned order is passed does not seem to have been numbered in the Court below. It is difficult to appreciate why it was not numbered.
( 5 ) THE petitioner herein is the plaintiff decreeholder in O. S. No. 110 of 1996. A decree in her favour was passed for specific performance of contract of sale of certain property. The decree provided that the plaintiff-decreeholder shall pay the balance of sale consideration of Rs. 1,60,000/- within a period of 15 days and thereupon the defendants-judgment-debtors shall execute the registered sale deed within a month.
( 6 ) IT appears that the decree-holder (Plaintiff) was unable to deposit the balance of sale consideration of Rs. 1,60,000/- as directed under the decree and he accordingly filed the said I. A. for extension of time on 10-8-1999 i. e. , within 15 d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.