SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 8

V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


V. RAJAGOPALA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners seek a writ of mandamus or other appropriate order or direction declaring Bhagyanagar (Hyderabad) Urban Development Authority Regulations, 1981, Bhagyanagar (Hyderabad) Multi-storeyed Building Regulations, 1981 and the Government Memo No. 2116/1 (1)/81-1 MA, dated 2-2-1982 as null and void and consequently to declare that the 1 st petitioner s use of the premises bearing No. 6-3-570, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, for commercial purposes including printing and publishing of newspapers and various structures raised therein are in accordance with the Development Plan sanctioned by the Government vide G. O. Ms. No. 414, dated 27-9-75 and published under Rule 13 of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (Development Plan) Rules, 1967, which is the Master Plan under the said Act and therefore in accordance with law; and consequently to direct the respondents not to take any action against the constructions and use thereof in respect of premises bearing No. 6-3-570, Somajiguda, Hyderabad or any part thereof.

( 2 ) THE broad facts of the case, which are relevant for the disposal of the writ petition are as under: The first petitioner entered into an ag















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top