SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 16

A.HANUMANTHU
N. Babji – Appellant
Versus
N. Sarada and Anr. – Respondent


A. HANUMANTHU, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is Referred against the order dated 29-12-1995 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam in MP No. 94/95 in MCNo. 15/1985 dismissing the petition.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief, resulting in filing of this revision, are as under : The revision-petitioner herein is the husband of the respondent herein. For the sake of convenience, they are referred as wife and husband hereinafter. The respondent herein is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner. They lived happily for some time. As disputes arose between them, they are living separately. The wife filed OP No. 122/82 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Visakhapatnam for restitution of conjugal rights and that was allowed on 30-12-1982 directing the petitioner herein to go and live with the respondent, and give conjugal happiness to the respondent. Ex. P1 is the certified copy of the order in OP No. 122/82, There was no restitution of conjugal rights between the parties in pursuance of the said order. Subsequently, there were exchange of notices between the parties. The wife also filed MC No. 15/85 for granting maintenance and that petition was allowed on 18-11-1985 and m







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top