SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 60

B.S.A.SWAMY
Sub-Registrar, Nalgonda Dist – Appellant
Versus
Amaranaini China Venkat Rao – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) A very important question of law fells for consideration in this revision petition i. e. , what is the stamp duty payable on a sale deed executed by the Court pursuant to a judgment and decree in a suit for performance, on the basis of an agreement of sale. To put it in more clear terms whether the Registering Officer can demand stamp duty on the basis of the prevailing market value of the property on the date of execution of the regular sale deed by the Court without reference to the consideration which the purchaser/ vendee agreed to purchase the property under an agreement of sale and without reference to the time taken by the Courts in decreeing the suit for specific performance.

( 2 ) THE factual matrix of the case is that respondents herein seemed to have entered into an agreement of sale on 27-06-1965 to purchase an extent of Ac 300. 00 of land in Vajincpalli Village, Nalgonda District for a consideration of Rs. 10,500. 00 from one S. Venkata Laxmamma. When the said lady refused to execute the sale deed as per the terms of the agreement of sale, these individuals seemed to have filed O. S. No. 23 of 1968 seeking a decree for specific performance of th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top