SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 78

B.V.RANGA RAJU, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
A. P. S. R. T. C – Appellant
Versus
P. T. Rao – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Writ Appeal is directed at the instance of the appellants - APSRTC against the order of the learned single Judge made in W. P. No. 6133 of 1990 dated 25-3-1997.

( 2 ) THE Writ Petition was filed by the employees of the Corporation seeking a direction to the Corporation to regularise the services of the writ petitioners from the date of their initial appointment. The learned single Judge disposed of the above said writ petition filed by the employees of the Corporation with a direction that the rcgularisation of services of the petitioners shall be considered keeping in view of the directions granted by this Court in Writ Appeal No. 705 of 1995.

( 3 ) SRI C. V. Ramulu, the learned Standing Counsel for the appellants-Corporation submits that an employee is entitled to seek regularisation of his services provided a clear vacancy was available as on that date and if such clear vacancy exists, he would be appointed in such regular vacancy. It is fairly submitted that the services of the employees were to be regularised taking into consideration his initial appointment and completion of 240 working days. He is also right in his submission that the employee is not entitled to t




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top