B.V.RANGA RAJU, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
A. P. S. R. T. C – Appellant
Versus
P. T. Rao – Respondent
( 2 ) THE Writ Petition was filed by the employees of the Corporation seeking a direction to the Corporation to regularise the services of the writ petitioners from the date of their initial appointment. The learned single Judge disposed of the above said writ petition filed by the employees of the Corporation with a direction that the rcgularisation of services of the petitioners shall be considered keeping in view of the directions granted by this Court in Writ Appeal No. 705 of 1995.
( 3 ) SRI C. V. Ramulu, the learned Standing Counsel for the appellants-Corporation submits that an employee is entitled to seek regularisation of his services provided a clear vacancy was available as on that date and if such clear vacancy exists, he would be appointed in such regular vacancy. It is fairly submitted that the services of the employees were to be regularised taking into consideration his initial appointment and completion of 240 working days. He is also right in his submission that the employee is not entitled to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.