SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 103

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY, UMESH C.BANERJEE
Y. C. RAJWAR – Appellant
Versus
Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Ministry of Home Affairs, singareni COLLIERIES COMPANY Ltd. , BELLAMPALLI – Respondent


UMESH CHANDRA BANERJEE, C. J.

( 1 ) THE short question that falls for consideration in these petitions is in regard to (he maintainability of the departmental proceedings after the acquittal in a criminal case.

( 2 ) THE contextual facts depict that while the petitioner was working as Sub- inspector (Executive), Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) attached to the singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Ramakrishnapur, the Sub-Inspector of police, Mancherial filed a charge-sheet against the writ petitioner in Crime no. 40/93 under Sections 307,353, 34 and 506 IPC alleging that on 21-5-1993 at about 11-30 p. m. the writ petitioner and others assaulted the Inspector, CISF b. Raju and made a criminal threat against him and subsequently in furtherance of the above incident, he is alleged to have some to the Government Hospital, mancherial on 29-5-1993 at 10. 25p. m. while he said Raju was getting treatment and attempted to kill him by pressing the throat for which a case in Crime no. 98/93 has been registered for the offence under Section 307 IPC. Since the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC was exclusively triable by the court of Sessions, the case was committed to the Assistant







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top