SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 121

S.S.HUSSAINI
T. C. I. Finance Limited – Appellant
Versus
S. Venkateswara Rao – Respondent


S. S. HUSSAINI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD both the Counsel.

( 2 ) THE petitioner-plaintiff has filed this revision aggrieved by the orders of the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Sccunderabad in I. A. No. 1031/97 in O. S. No. 311/1997, dated 3-11-1997.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that a suit O. S. No. 311/97 has been filed for recovery of Rs. 7,78,643. 00 along with a petition under Order 38, Rule 5 C. P. C. praying to order attachment before judgment the plot bearing No. 585 admeasuring 346 sq. yards situated at Salebnagar, Kurdu Village, L. B. Nagar Municipality, Hayatnagar Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District covered by Sy. No. 52 to 56 and also to order an attachment before judgment of movables and immovables as pointed out by the petitioner at the time of attachment such as plant and machinery, tables, chairs, almirahs along with the building etc.

( 4 ) IT is stated by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act and carrying on business and it is having its registered office at Secunderabad. The first respondent represented by its Managing Partner and other partners approached the plaintiff Co















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top