SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 176

MOTILAL B.NAIK, V.BHASKARA RAO
S. Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
S. Bheem Reddy – Respondent


( 1 ) DR. Motilal B. Naik, J.-This appeal is directed against the order and decree in O. P. No. 139 of 1995 dated 9. 9. 1996 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) WIFE is the appellant before us. The husband who is the respondent herein has originally filed O. P. No. 245 of 1994 on the file of the II Additional Judge. City Civil Court, hyderabad which was subsequently transferred to the Court of the Judge, Family Court and re-numbered as O. P. No. 139 of 1995, under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the wife seeking dissolution of their marriage on the grounds of cruelty and desertion by the wife.

( 3 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as petitioner-husband and respondent-wife . The O. P. , is instituted by the petitioner-husband on the following allegations :according to the petitioner-husband, their marriage took place on 25. 5. 1989 according to Hindu Custom and Law. From the beginning, the respondent-wife had no liking for the petitioner-husband and had developed positive aversion towards the husband. She was expressing that her marriage with him was under pressure from her parents. She was frequently leaving the house of



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top