SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 178

S.S.HUSSAINI
Y. NARAYANA MURTHY – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. REP. BY THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, LAND REFORMS TRIBUNAL, ELURU – Respondent


S. S. HUSSAINI, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioners Mr. M. V. Durga Prasad.

( 2 ) MR. M. V. Durga Prasad, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are real brothers of respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 2 filed declaration in L. C. C. No. 1146/elr/75 under Section 8 of the A. P. Land reforms Act on behalf of his family unit consisting of himself, his wife, a minor son and a minor daughter. The Primary Tribunal by its order dated 15-11-1976 determined the holding of respondent No. 2 and held that he holds an extent of land equivalent to 0. 2914 and later under order dated 18-12-1978 to 0. 2800 S. H. , in excess of the ceiling area. This holding was arrived at in the light of the orders of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal in L. R. A. No. 593/77, dated 4-12-1978.

( 3 ) AGAINST the said order, respondent No. 2 filed a revision before this Court in C. R. P. No. 5499/1979 but the same was dismissed on 4-3-1980 and the order of the lower Tribunal was confirmed. The Land Reforms Tribunal after issuing form VI notice selected some of the land specified in the schedule, after following the due procedure, against which, respondent No. 2 filed L. R.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top