SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 192

A.HANUMANTHU
SANJAY KUMAR AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
T. V. N. PRASAD – Respondent


A. HANUMANTHU, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is preferred against the Orders dated 01-12-1997 in i. A. No. 396 of 1997 in R. C. No. 269 of 1995 on the file of the Principal Rent controller, Secunderabad.

( 2 ) THE revision petitioner is the tenant and the respondent herein is the landlord in R. C. No. 269 of 1995. The respondent filed an eviction petition on the ground of wilful default and bona fide requirement of the premises which have been let out to the revision petitioner. The revision petitioner-tenant resisted that application denying the alleged wilful default and he also disputed the claim of bona fide requirement. The evidence has been let in or both sides and when the matter is posted for arguments, the tenant filed I. A no. 396 of 1997 under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure code for amendment of his counter adding para-5 (a) to the effect that as successor of his mother, the respondent-landlord became the owner of the adjacent shop bearing No. 34 and that the landlord also got issued notice to the tenant of that shop and as such the landlord could as well seek eviction of the tenant of that shop and the landlord filed the present eviction petit














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top