SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 203

R.BAYAPU REDDY
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A. P. , Hyd – Appellant
Versus
Purushotham Reddy – Respondent


R. BAYAPU REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE appeal is sought to be filed by the State represented by the Public prosecutor questioning the orders of acquittal passed by the IV Additional metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in S. C. No. 69/95 on 28-6-96, and crl. M. P. 5163/97 is filed for condoning the delay of 337 days involved in presenting the said appeal.

( 2 ) THE respondent herein was the accused in S. C. 69/95 on the file of the iv Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad and after the trial of the case was over, the accused was acquitted by the Judgment dated 28-6-96. Subsequently the State has chosen to file the present Appeal on 17-9-97 against the orders of acquittal. As there was delay of 337 days involved in filing the appeal, the state has filed Crl. M. P. 5163/97 for condoning such delay. The petition for condoning the delay is supported by an affidavit given by the Detective Sub- inspector of Police, Begumpet Police Station, Secunderabad. The reasons urged in the affidavit for such delay are that after the judgment was pronounced on 28-6-96 by the lower Court, a copy application was made for obtaining the certified copy of the judgment on 1-7-96 in copy application no. 5900/96 an





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top