V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE judgment-debtors in EP No. 334 of 1990 have filed this revision petition challenging the order in EA No. 246 of 1994 on the file of First Additional District Munsif, Tirupati, dated 10-4-1996 on the ground that though the EP schedule property has been sold in execution of the decree, the sale was confirmed and the sale certificate was issued and full satisfaction of the decree was recorded, the lower Court erroneously held that the decree-holder was entitled to recover the E. P. amount.

( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances leading to this revision petition in brief are :the respondent - decree-holder No. 1 obtained a decree on 7-9-1989 against late V. Srinivasulu Naidu, husband of revision petitioner No. 1 and father of other revision petitioners and subsequently, he filed EP No. 334 of 1990 for recovery of the amount. An extent of Ac. 0. 05 cents in S. No. 142/6 belonging to him was brought to sale for a sum of Rs. 9,000. 00 and the same was knocked down in favour of the respondent - decree-holder No. 1. The said sale has been confirmed and sale certificate was also issued and then respondent No. 1 filed EA No. 636 of 1993 for taking delivery of possessio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document