SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 346

V.BHASKARA RAO
Valluri Sri Vasudeva Siva Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Alluri Kurminaidu – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition arises from the order in I. A. No. 5 of 1997 in O. S. No. 374 of 1997 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Salur holding that the Court fee paid in the above suit is not correct and directing the revision petitioner - plaintiff and Respondent No. 8 to pay the proper Court fee.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this C. R. P. are as follows: The revision petitioner and Respondent No. 8 filed the suit for permanent injunction in respect of AC. 104. 75 cents of land claiming that they have purchased the same along with 24 others whom they represent. The property has been valued notionally at Rs. 2,000. 00 for the purpose of Court-fee. The respondents filed a written statement contesting the suit and issues were framed and thereafter the trial also commenced. The revision petitioner examined himself as P. W. 1 and also marked some documents. At this stage, the respondents filed I. A. No. 5 of 1997 under Section 151 C. P. C. seeking a direction to the revision petitioner and Respondent No. 8 to pay the Court-fee on each relief in respect of each plot of the plaint schedule property. It is asserted in the affidavit of Respondent No. 1 that th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top