SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 355

V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
JAMUNABAI – Appellant
Versus
SHARADABAI – Respondent


V. RAJAGOPALA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE appeal arises out of the judgment and decree passed by the VIth additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in O. S. No. 1110/81, decreeing the suit in part.

( 2 ) THE 1st respondent-plalntiff filed the suit for recovery of possession ofa Schedule property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants- respondents 3 to 5 from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of b Schedule property/and for damages for the use and illegal occupation of plalnt-A Schedule portion. The suit was decreed except for the relief of awarding damages. The facts, in brief, are as follows: the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit. Sharbati Bai was married to one Ganesh Lal, who had four sons viz. , Brijmohan, Shambudayal gupta, Jagadish Pershad and Omprakash Gupta. Ganesh Lal died in 1973 leaving his widow Sharbati Bai and his sons.

( 3 ) SHARBATI Bai and Ganesh Lal along with his four sons constituted Hindujoint Family. Brijmohan, married 1st defendant. His son is the 2nd defendant. Brijmohan predeceased his father. Sharbati Bai had originally purchased an old building in Charkaman locality, Hyderabad, through a registered sale deed d


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top