SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 374

S.R.NAYAK
N. RAGHUMA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. rep. by the Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms), AUTHORISED OFFICER – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE two Civil Revision Petitions, C. R. P. No. 3279/93 and C. R. P. No. 4116/94 relate to same subject matter, that is to say, the lands covered by the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (for short the Act ). Hence, these two C. R. Ps are clubbed and heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) CR-P. NO. 3279/93 is directed against the order dt. 20-8-1993 passed inl. R. A. No. 41/92 on the file of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Ranga reddy District whereas C. R. P. No. 4116/94 is directed against the order dt,20-8-1993 passed in L. R. A. No. 22/92 on the file of the aforementioned Land reforms Appellate Tribunal. L. R. A. No. 41 /92 as well as L. R. A. No. 22/92 were disposed of by the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, R. R. District by a common order.

( 3 ) THE relevant facts for the purpose of disposal of the C. R. Ps be noted briefly as under: the father of the petitioners, namely, one N. Raghuma Reddy was head of the joint family consisting of himself and the petitioners 2 to 4 in cr. P. No. 3279/93. After the Act came into force, the said Raghuma Reddy filed declarations on beha






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top