( 1 ) IN the Writ Petition origninally presented before this Court the petitioner assailed the order of the District Educational Officer, Hyderabad, the second respondent herein, dt. 29-3-1991 not approving the appointment of the petitioner as School Assistant, but appointing her as S. G. B. Teacher and further seeking direction to the respondents to continue the petitioner as B. Ed. School assistant and pay to her the salary attached to the said post by direct payment system regularly.

( 2 ) ALTHOUGH numerous facts are stated in the pleadings and certaindocuments are placed before the Court for perusal and consideration, the question which falls for consideration is in a narrow compass. The only question which falls for consideration is whether the petitioner or the 4th respondent is entitled to be appointed against one sanctioned post of B. Ed. School Assistant as sanctioned vide G. O. Ms. No. 178, Education (SSE. 1) department, dt. 23-7-1990. Before dealing with this question, few relevant facts germane to the decision be noted as under: the petitioner was initially appointed as B. Ed. School Assistant in the third respondent School in an unaided post on 9-7-1980