B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE three appeals arise out of the judgment and decree dated 12th June, 1995 passed in O. S. No. 1071 of 1985 by the Court of the IV Additional Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad. Of course, it is a common judgment in the said suit and also in suit O. S. No. 548 of 1990. In O. S. No. 1071 of 1985, one p. Kishanlal is the plaintiff and as he died, his legal representatives were added as plaintiffs 2 to 8. That is a suit instituted against M/s. Smt. Yasoda bai, V. Narasimha Chary and Angoori Bai claiming specific performance in respect of suit schedule building comprising of two floors and bearing municipal Nos. 21-2-146 and 21-2-156 situated at Gulzar House, Charkaman, hyderabad. In O. S. No. 548 of 1990, same P. Kishanlal is the plaintiff and on account of his death, his legal representatives were added as plaintiffs 2 to 8 and the defendants are M/s. Angoori Bai, Chaturbhuj and V. Narasimha chary. In the said suit, the relief is for the grant of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the ground floor mulgi bearing No. 21-2-156.

( 2 ) THE suit in O. S. No. 1071 of 1985 is based on oral agr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document