SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 415

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
K. Rajasekhara Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) A short but interesting and important question arises for consideration in this petition. The point for decision is whether this Court, in exercise of its power under Section 438 of Cr. P. C. can direct the release of a person against his anticipated arrest on a mere apprehension or suspicion that a person is likely to be arrested on a possible accusation of a non-bailable offence?

( 2 ) THE petitioner says that he was the Manager of Vasundhara Chit Fund and Finance, Amangal. According to him, some disputes arose between the partners of the said Chit Fund and Finance. It is alleged that other partners started harassing the petitioner demanding huge amounts from him. Civil disputes amongst the partners are stated to be pending. While the matter stood thus, the other partners of the Chit Fund company are alleged to have given a complaint to the Inspector of Police, Amangal Police Station against the petitioner. Even according to that the Inspector of Police is demanding the family members of the petitioner to produce the petitioner immediately in the Police Station. It is stated that the Inspector of Police, Amangal Police Station is trying to harass him an


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top