P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, T.RANGA RAO
Krovidi Kameswaramma – Appellant
Versus
Kudapa Balaramayya – Respondent
( 2 ) HOWEVER, it is the case of the first plaintiff that he has been althrough ready and willing to perform his part of the contract but the defendants were never ready to comply with the terms of the contract. It is further stated in the plaint that apart from Rs. 20,000. 00 paid on 11-12-1982 to the defendants a further sum of Rs. 30,000. 00 was paid on 16-1-1983 for discharge of the bank debt due by the defendants. No endorsement of part payment for this amount was made by the d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.