V.BHASKARA RAO
K. RAMULU – Appellant
Versus
K. NARSIMULU – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a review petition against the order dated 3-4-1998 in CRP No. 3037 of 1996.
( 2 ) THE Review Petition arises in the following circumstances. Sri A. Panduranga Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioners was not keeping good health for some time during the period preceding 3-4-1998. The Civil revision Petition was adjourned several times on that ground and ultimately the order under review has been passed after hearingsri M. Raja Malla Reddy, learned Counsel for the respondents. Aggrieved by that order, this Review petition is filed.
( 3 ) SRI A. Panduranga Rao, (sic.) learned Counsel for the respondent has been heard at length in the main Civil Revision Petition which is directed against the docket order dated 9-8-1996 in O. S. No. 2 of 1989 on the file of the subordinate Judge, Sanga Reddy.
( 4 ) THE following question has been formulated for consideration by the learned Subordinate Judge, "whether the document in question is an award, compulsorily registrable under Section 49 read with Section 17 (l) (c) of the Registration Act and if so whether it is admissible in evidence. "
( 5 ) AFTER setting out the pleas of both sides, the contents of the docume
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.