SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 436

A.HANUMANTHU
BULASALA SUBBARAVAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SAPARAM VENKATA SUBBAMMA – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the Judgment and decree dated 18-01-1989 passed in A. S. No. 8 of 1979 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Chirala, reversing the Judgment and decree dated 07-12-1978 passed in O. S. No. 664 of 1974 on the file of the District Munsif, Chirala.

( 2 ) THE appellants herein are the original plaintiff Bulasala Subba Ravamma and her legal heirs who have been added subsequent to her death and the respondent herein is the defendant in the said suit O. S. No, 664 of 1974. For the sake of convenience, the parties are being referred as they are arrayed in the suit.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff filed the said suit seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the open site shown as A,b,c,d and marked as plot No. 2 in the plaint plan situated in front of her house marked as plot No. 1 in the plaint plan. The defendant is the owner of the house marked as plot No. 3 and also the open site which is in front of her house (Plot No. 3) and marked as plot no. 4 in the plaint plan. The house and the open site belonging to the defendant are situated to the south of the house and the open site of the p













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top