SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 428

A.HANUMANTHU, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Government of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
MOHD. MOINUDDIN HUSSAN – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THESE writ appeals one by the State and another by the Requisitioning department i. e. the Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage board, are filed against the judgment of the learned single judge in W. P. No. 17156/96 read with the order passed in the Review W. P. M. P. No. 27483 of 1996 in the said writ petition. The writ petition filed by the respondents herein was allowed with a direction to pay compensation at the rate prevailing on the date of issue of last Notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) i. e. 3-6-1995. The review petition filed by the appellants herein was dismissed on 2-12-1996. Hence these writ appeals by the State and H. M. W. Board.

( 2 ) THE writ petition was filed seeking a direction to the respondents (appellants in W. A. No. 1126 of 1997) to pass an award in respect of the acquired land in S. No. 54, of Alwal village, Rangareddy district by fixing the market value prevailing on the date of issuance of the notification under Sec. 4 (1) in G. O. Rt. No. 639, M. A. and U. D. dated 30-5-1995. in order to acquire the land for construction of 3 mg. surface reservoir
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top