SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 533

S.R.NAYAK
C. PATTABHIRAMA SASTRY – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda, rep. by the Chairman, MANAGING DIRECTOR, BOMBAY – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is an officer in Middle Management Grade Scale-II in the establishment of Bank of Baroda. The validity of the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner. ultimately culminating in imposition of the penalty of reduction by three stages in time scale in Middle Management Grade scale-II with effect from 25-2-1989 at the hands of the Chairman and the managing Director of the Bank, who is the reviewing authority under regulation 18 of the Bank of Baroda Officer Employees (Discipline and Appeal) regulations, 1976, for short Dand A Regulations is assailed in the writ petition. The petitioner has also sought for declaration that the action of the respondents in recovering the Professional Qualification Allowance (PQA) for the period from 1-7-1989 as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the respondents to continue the payment of PQA duly refunding the amounts already recovered.

( 2 ) THE petitioner joined the service of the Bank as clerk on 16-4-1964 and he was confirmed in that cadre with effect from 16-10-1964. The petitioner was subsequently promoted to Junior Management Grade Scale-I with effect from 1-5-1971. Fur















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top