K. S. SHRIVASTAV, J.

( 1 ) COMMONALITY of questions of law and similarity of facts incline me to dispose of these five company petitions by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has filed these five petitions under Sections 433 (e) and (f) and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, for compulsory winding up of the respondent companies. The petitioner is a public limited company. It was formerly known as the state Industrial and investment Corporation of Maharashtra Limited . The petitioner is known now as SICOM Limited. The respondent/ Companies are Public Limited Companies and the main object of these respondent/companies is to carry on the business of poultry farming, hatchery, breeder houses, eggs producing and distribution centres and construction of poultry houses and stores.

( 3 ) THE State of Maharashtra, vide its resolution No. IDL 1088/ (6693)/ind-8, dated 30-9-1988, issued a publication entitled maharashtra s Package Scheme of Incentives, 1988 and through this, declared various incentives to several industries covered under the said incentive scheme including poultry and agro-industries. It classified the State into four categories, namely A, B, C and D. d category woul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document