SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 550

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY, R.M.BAPAT
SARDAR AMARJEET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NANDU BAI – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff in the suit - O. S. No. 514 of 1974, on the file of the First additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad is the appellant herein. The suit was filed for specific performance of an agreement of sale (Ex. A-1), dated 5-12-1971, executed by defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in favour of the plaintiff. The agreement of sale relates to vacant land of an extent of 6240 Sq. Yards in s. No. 157, etc. , situated at Ameerpet, Hyderabad city. The sale price as per ; the agreement is Rs. 70,280/ -. Defendant Nos. 3 to 7 are those who purchased the same property under an alleged prior agreement of sale i. e. , Ex. B-8, dated 20-6-1968. The suit for specific performance was dismissed by the trial Court mainly on the ground that the vendee failed to establish that he was ready and willing to fulfil his part of the obligations under the agreement and his conduct in not taking any steps for considerable time disentitled him to the specific relief sought for in the suit.

( 2 ) ON appeal, the learned single Judge affirmed the judgment of the lower court. The learned Judge, while affirming the finding of the trial Court on the question of readiness and willingness,










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top