SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 548

A.HANUMANTHU
Y. Venkateswarlu – Appellant
Versus
V. Narayana Pillai – Respondent


A. HANUMANTHU, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals have been preferred under Section 100 of Civil Procedure code against the common judgment and decree dated 22-7-1997 passed in a. S. No. 95/96 and A. S. No. 105/96 on the file of V Additional District Judge, tirupathi, reversing the common judgment and decree dated 22-8-1996 passed in O. S. No. 42/92 and O. S. No. 123/92 on the file of I Additional District Munsif, Tirupathi.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience the parties are being referred as they are arrayed in O. S. No. 42/92.

( 3 ) THE dispute in both the suits relates to the membership bearing batch number 52 in Tirumala-Tirupathi Devasthanam Kalyanakatta at Tirumala. The membership in that Batch No. 52 of Kalyanakatta vests rights on the member to participate in tonsure at that Kalyanakatta and he is entitled for remuneration as paid by Devasthanam. Unless one becomes a member under that Kalyanakatta Sangam, no one is entitled for participating in the tonsuring ritual and for the emoluments. The membership bearing batch number 52 originally belonged to one Y. Krishna Murthy. He died on 28-3-1969 leaving behind his widow Y. Venkataratnamma, his minor son Y. Venkataeswarulu and minor daug















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top