R.BAYAPU REDDY
Guthula Satyamma – Appellant
Versus
Rudraraju Venkataraju – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision is filed by the defendants 2, 3, 6 and 7 in O. S. No. 76 of 1989 on the file of the District Munisif, Alamuru, East Godavari District questioning the impugned order dated 21-3-1996 passed in I. A. No. 883 of 1995, entrusting the warrant of commission to another advocate for inspecting the suit locality and for filing his report.
( 2 ) THE first respondent herein is the plaintiff in the suit and he filed the suit originally in the vacation Court (District Court) at Rajahmundry. He also filed a petition for appointment of Commissioner to inspect the suit locality and file his report. The vacation Court appointed an advocate of Rajahmundry as Commissioner. The Commissioner visited the suit locality and prepared his report and plait and filed it in the Court on 1-6-89, As some more features have to be observed and in view of the objections filed by the present petitioners the warrant was re-entrusted to hint for execution and the Commissioner accordingly visited the suit locality second time and filed his report on 13-12-1995 in the Court. Subsequently the plaintiff filed I. A. No 883 of 1995 requesting the Court to entrust the warrant of commissi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.