SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 558

R.BAYAPU REDDY
Guthula Satyamma – Appellant
Versus
Rudraraju Venkataraju – Respondent


R. BAYAPU REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is filed by the defendants 2, 3, 6 and 7 in O. S. No. 76 of 1989 on the file of the District Munisif, Alamuru, East Godavari District questioning the impugned order dated 21-3-1996 passed in I. A. No. 883 of 1995, entrusting the warrant of commission to another advocate for inspecting the suit locality and for filing his report.

( 2 ) THE first respondent herein is the plaintiff in the suit and he filed the suit originally in the vacation Court (District Court) at Rajahmundry. He also filed a petition for appointment of Commissioner to inspect the suit locality and file his report. The vacation Court appointed an advocate of Rajahmundry as Commissioner. The Commissioner visited the suit locality and prepared his report and plait and filed it in the Court on 1-6-89, As some more features have to be observed and in view of the objections filed by the present petitioners the warrant was re-entrusted to hint for execution and the Commissioner accordingly visited the suit locality second time and filed his report on 13-12-1995 in the Court. Subsequently the plaintiff filed I. A. No 883 of 1995 requesting the Court to entrust the warrant of commissi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top