B.S.A.SWAMY
Grandhi Venkata Chitti Abbai – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) ASSAILING the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Rajam, dated 10-7-1998 made in unnumbered IA in GR No. 707 (dated 23-6-1998) in OP No. 8 of 1998 wherein the subordinate Court refused to advance the hearing of OP No. 8 of 1998, filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short, the Act ) seeking divorce by mutual consent, from 28-12-1998 to 29-6-1998, the present revision petition is filed.
( 2 ) THE factual matrix of the case are that the second petitioner was given in marriage to the first petitioner about a decade back and she has also given birth to two daughters aged about 9 years and 7 years. As per the version of the second petitioner-wife, the first petitioner-husband was habituated for bad vices apart from developing grouse for giving birth to two female children and started harassing the second petitioner both mentally and physically. By 1995 no point of retrieval has taken place and serious differences have arisen and it has become impossible for her to live with him. In those circumstances, she came out of the marital house and initially filed MC No. 17 of 1995 under Section 125 Crl. PC on the file of District Munsif Court, Rajam, seek
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.