SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 628

B.S.A.SWAMY
Grandhi Venkata Chitti Abbai – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) ASSAILING the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Rajam, dated 10-7-1998 made in unnumbered IA in GR No. 707 (dated 23-6-1998) in OP No. 8 of 1998 wherein the subordinate Court refused to advance the hearing of OP No. 8 of 1998, filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short, the Act ) seeking divorce by mutual consent, from 28-12-1998 to 29-6-1998, the present revision petition is filed.

( 2 ) THE factual matrix of the case are that the second petitioner was given in marriage to the first petitioner about a decade back and she has also given birth to two daughters aged about 9 years and 7 years. As per the version of the second petitioner-wife, the first petitioner-husband was habituated for bad vices apart from developing grouse for giving birth to two female children and started harassing the second petitioner both mentally and physically. By 1995 no point of retrieval has taken place and serious differences have arisen and it has become impossible for her to live with him. In those circumstances, she came out of the marital house and initially filed MC No. 17 of 1995 under Section 125 Crl. PC on the file of District Munsif Court, Rajam, seek






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top