SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 658

S.R.NAYAK
K. KATAIAH – Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Co-operative Societies, A. P. , Hyderabad – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) IN the writ petition, as originally presented, a writ of quo warranto was sought against the respondents 2, 3 and 4. In the election held on 2-4-1997 to elect the office bearers and Directors of the Committee of Management of the fifth respondent Co-operative Society, namely, Mutyalarao Co-operative housing Society Limited, the respondents 3 and 4 were elected as Directors, whereas the respondent No. 2 was elected as the President of the said society. The petitioners are the members of the society. According to the petitioners, the respondents 2, 3 and 4, on the date of filing of their nominations, were working as employees; the respondent No. 2 was working as an employee of Hindustan Machine Tools, a Central Government Undertaking; the respondent No. 3 was working as Upper Division Clerk in Defence meteorological Research Laboratories (DMRL); and the respondent No. 4 was working as an Attender in the Bank of Baroda, and therefore all of them were disqualified to be members of the society by force of the disqualification prescribed under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of Section 21-A of the Andhra pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964, for short the Act , as





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top