SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 638

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, NEELAM SANJIVA REDDY
V. GOPALAKRISHNAIAH – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, KAKINADA – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) ALL these writ petitions have been filed by the employees working in the district Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. , of various districts seeking a direction to the respondents in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in fixing the age of superannuation of the petitioners at 58 years and contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Shops and establishments Act, 1988 (Act 20 of 1988) (for short the Act, 1988); and for a consequential order directing the respondents to continue the petitioners in service upto the age of sixty (60) years in the respondents-Banks.

( 2 ) THE point that arises for consideration in all these writ petitions is one and the same, Hence all these writ petitions are clubbed together and disposed of by this common judgment.

( 3 ) THE facts, in brief, are that the petitioners in these writ petitions are appointed in the respondents/banks in various districts under various capacities and discharging their duties. It is their contention that they have no managerial, administrative or supervisory power since their duties are basically clerical in nature, that the petitioners are working within the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top