SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 692

BILAL NAZKI
G. Venkataramanaiah – Appellant
Versus
SILLAKOLLU VENKATESWARLU – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) A complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act r/w section 420 IPC is pending against the petitioner before the learned Additional district Munsif Magistrate, Kandukur. The complaint is sought to be quashed on various grounds, some of them refer to the factual aspects of the matter which this Court will not entertain under the provisions of Section 482 Cr. P. C. However, two legal grounds have been taken which will be considered by this Court presently.

( 2 ) ONE of the grounds taken is that the complaint has been filed beyondtime. I have gone through the complaint. The cheque was allegedly issued on 6th March, 1998, it was presented to the banker within six months and it was returned on 9-3-1998 with the endorsement that the accused had closed his account as early as on 4-9-1997. Notice was issued to the accused on 26th march, 1998 for making the payment. Payment was not made and the complaint was made on 8th May, 1998. Since the notice was given on 26th march, 1998 the cause of action would accrue to the complainant on expiry of 15 days clear notice, because within 15 days the accused could make the payment. That would mean the complainant has to





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top