SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 719

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
Commissioner of Police, A. P. Hyd – Appellant
Versus
Sadruddin H. Javeri – Respondent


( 1 ) THE above Review Petitions and Contempt Cases are filed seeking review of the common judgment of this Court in Writ Petitions Nos. 4926 and 17700 of 1996, dated 17-10-1997 and complaining that the directions given in the judgment were not complied with. Hence, all the review petitions and contempt cases are taken up together for disposal by a common order.

( 2 ) REV. WPMP Nos. 36129 and 36061 of 1997 are filed by the 3rd respondent in both the writ petitions-Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad.

( 3 ) REV. WPMP No. 5942 of 1998 is filed by 4th respondent in WP No. 4926 of 1997.

( 4 ) REV. WPMP No. 34434 of 1997 is filed by 8th respondent in WP No. 4926 of 1997 and respondents 4, 5 and 6 in WPNo. 17700 of 1996.

( 5 ) CONTEMPT Cases Nos. 1797 and 1798 of 1997 are filed by the writ petitioner in both the writ petitions. Rev. WPMP Nos. 36129. 36061 and 34434 of 1997 and 5942 of 1998:before we proceed to consider the review petitions, it is necessary to notice the facts of the case, in brief, and disclosed in the judgment, which is reported in 1998 (4) ALD 113.

( 6 ) THE parties are mentioned as they are shown in the writ petitions. The petitioner moved the Court under Article 226 of


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top